First Amendment and Religious
The First Amendment protects the citizens against religious discrimination. The amendment states that the government cannot make laws that undermine religious freedom (McClain, 2018). The student who has drawn the picture about Jesus and the last supper is free to express their religious freedom. No law can be used to show that the student has done something wrong. The First Amendment forbids Congress from making laws that will undermine the people’s freedom (McClain, 2018). The amendment’s focus is to allow people to live free without discrimination. It is unlike other countries that prohibit people from expressing their religious freedom. For example, some of the countries in the Middle East undermine the opportunity to express religious freedom outside the Muslim faith. America comprises a cosmopolitan community of residents who come from diverse parts of the world. It is vital to respect the religious beliefs of others despite their differences.
The First Amendment shows that the government cannot restrict people’s freedom to practice or assemble to express their religion (McClain, 2018). The student is simply practicing the religious faith in class. It is vital to respect the opinion of the student. Painting a portrait of Jesus as the hero and the last supper as a catchy moment in their faith is acceptable. The teacher can only commend the child for expressing religious views. The student shows they understand the religious practice of the Christian faith since Jesus is the cornerstone of the faith. For instance, in the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), students won the case against the school that was restricting them from wearing black armbands in school as an expression of their faith (Ried, 2018).
I need writing help with my dissertation – cheap thesis writing services
Painting a picture of the last supper expresses the Easter holidays. The Christian faith commemorates the Easter holidays by remembering the day Jesus held a last supper with the disciples. Although one of them betrayed him, he would later overcome death and rise against it. The last supper and Jesus on the cross are vital moments of the Christian faith. The student does not violate the provisions of the First Amendment that discourage people from obscenity and fraud in the expression of their freedom (Ried, 2018).
It will be justifiable to display the student’s work despite the Christian faith engraved in the picture. The reason is that the First Amendment does not allow people to restrict religious freedom (West, 2018). If the teacher fails to display the picture, it would amount to discrimination and undermining religious freedom. If other students have painted national figures such as Abraham Lincoln or other past presidents, it would be acceptable to display the paintings alongside that of Jesus and the disciples. The objective is that the student was correct in answering the question about painting a hero in their life.
The law protects individuals from government interference as they express their religious freedom. The student is under no prohibition that can stop the teacher from displaying the picture. The teacher cannot admonish the child or ask them to paint something different. For example, the Supreme Court in the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) ruled that a teacher cannot prohibit the expression of religious and personal beliefs about teen pregnancy (Eckes & Russo, 2021). The students won the case since the principal could not justify his reasons.
Eckes, S., & Russo, C. J. (2021). Teacher Speech Inside and Outside of Classrooms in the United States: Understanding the First Amendment. Laws, 10(4), 88.
McClain, L. C. (2018). Male Chauvinism Is under Attack from All Sides at Present: Roberts v. United States Jaycees, Sex Discrimination, and the First Amendment. Fordham L. Rev., 87, 2385.
Ried, K. (2018). Upholding student rights in the 20th century: An examination of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. Social Education, 82(2), 73-78.
West, S. R. (2018). Suing the President for First Amendment Violations. Okla. L. Rev., 71, 321.